Function Health vs Tally Health: Comprehensive Panel vs Epigenetic Age
Function Health and Tally Health are different products, not competitors. Function is a comprehensive biomarker membership ($365/year for 100+ markers per draw, twice a year, with MD review). Tally is a focused epigenetic biological-age service ($129-$159/month with cheek-swab DNA methylation testing and supplements, founded by David Sinclair). They serve different decisions, and the right pick depends on whether you want broad biomarker context or the biological-age metric specifically.
Function Health
3.9Comprehensive lab-testing membership with MD review of every biomarker
Tally Health
3.2Epigenetic biological age testing with David Sinclair as scientific founder
Reviewed by Designing Longevity Editorial·Last verified May 1, 2026
Bottom line
Function Health for most users, by a wide margin. Broader panel, lower all-in cost ($365/year vs $1,548-$1,908/year for Tally), MD review of every biomarker, larger Trustpilot sample with no fraud notice, and a single-tier transparent pricing model. Choose Tally Health only if you specifically want the epigenetic biological-age metric and value Sinclair's scientific provenance, and are comfortable with the small Trustpilot sample, recurring 9+ week result-delivery delays, and the operational uncertainty from the April 2026 Infinite Epigenetics acquisition.
Side-by-side at a glance
Who wins for each use case
We pick a winner per criterion and explain the reasoning. Skip to whichever rows match how you'd actually use the platform.
Panel breadth per dollar
Winner: Function HealthFunction delivers 100+ biomarkers per draw twice a year (200+ data points annually) for $365. Tally delivers a single epigenetic-age metric for $129-$159/month, which works out to $1,548-$1,908/year all-in. Function is roughly 4-5x more cost-effective on a per-data-point basis. The honest counterweight: Tally's metric is genuinely different from anything in Function's panel, so this comparison only makes sense if biomarker breadth is what you actually want.
Clinician interpretation depth
Winner: Function HealthFunction provides licensed-clinician written notes on every biomarker, organized by strengths, areas to watch, and recommendations. Tally provides a personalized Action Plan tied to the TallyAge result plus supplement recommendations. Function's interpretation is broader and more clinically structured; Tally's is narrower because the input data is narrower.
Result-delivery reliability
Winner: Function HealthFunction results return in 7-14 days from blood draw (consistent across Trustpilot reviews). Tally advertises 2-4 weeks but Trustpilot reviews document actual delivery sometimes running 9+ weeks, with users reporting kits sent in late January 2026 still without results by mid-April. The post-acquisition operational impact (April 2026 Infinite Epigenetics acquisition) is worth watching but adds uncertainty rather than removing it.
Trustpilot signal quality and volume
Winner: Function HealthFunction has 4.3/5 across roughly 1,009 reviews (no fraud notice). Tally has 3.6/5 across only 37 reviews. Both pages are clean (no suspected-fraudulent-review notices), but Function's order-of-magnitude larger sample is meaningfully more informative.
Scientific provenance and academic credibility
Winner: Tally HealthTally was founded by David Sinclair, the Harvard genetics professor whose underlying methylation research informs the TallyAge methodology. Function is co-founded by Dr. Mark Hyman, who is well-known but in functional medicine rather than longevity-science academia. For users who weight academic provenance specifically (especially the longevity-science community), Sinclair's name carries more weight in the field this product targets.
Focus on biological-age metric specifically
Winner: Tally HealthIf you specifically want a biological-age estimate (not a broad biomarker panel), Tally is purpose-built for that and Function is not. Function does include a biological-age calculation as one output but is not designed around it. For users whose entire goal is tracking epigenetic age over time, Tally is the more focused product.
Pricing transparency and structure
Winner: Function HealthFunction runs a single-tier $365/year membership with no upgrade path; what you pay is what you get for the standard panel. Tally runs three pricing options ($129/month for 4 tests, $159/month for 2 tests, or $249 standalone) plus the implicit cost of the bundled supplements. Function's simpler structure is easier to evaluate.
Operational stability
Winner: Function HealthFunction raised $298M Series B at $2.5B valuation in November 2025; the operational footing is unusually solid for the category. Tally was acquired by Infinite Epigenetics in April 2026 (one month before our verification date), which may improve operations but is recent enough that the impact is uncertain. For risk-averse users, Function's operational maturity is the cleaner choice.
Rubric scores side-by-side
Same six dimensions we use on every provider profile, weighted to a single 0-5 score. Click through to either profile for the verification details behind each row.
Licensure 20% weight
Accreditation 20% weight
Transparency 20% weight
Product quality 15% weight
Pricing 15% weight
Customer service 10% weight
Pricing in plain terms
Function: $365/year ($30/month equivalent) for two semi-annual full panels with MD review. HSA/FSA eligible (effective 25-35% pre-tax discount). Tally: $129/month ($1,548/year) for 4 tests/year + supplements, or $159/month ($1,908/year) for 2 tests/year + supplements, or $249 standalone. Tally is meaningfully more expensive per result but bundles supplements. The simplest decision: if you want broad biomarker context, Function is materially better value; if you specifically want the epigenetic-age metric, Tally is the focused product but you're paying a premium for the focus.
Read the full profiles
This comparison summarizes the head-to-head call. The full provider profiles include verification items, regulatory history, public-review aggregation, and the signup walkthrough.