Vetted Providers
Independently scored on a six-dimension public rubric. Transparent affiliate disclosure, never pay-to-rank.
13 providers
TrimRx
LegitScript-certified compounded GLP-1 telehealth
Strongest compliance posture in our initial GLP-1 cohort. LegitScript-certified at both the platform and pharmacy level, with transparent pricing and no major regulatory issues on record. Worth considering as a default option for users prioritizing cleaner sourcing over absolute lowest price.
$179-$259/mo (compounded sema/tirz)
No financial relationshipHone Health
Membership-model TRT telehealth with the strongest review-platform posture in our cohort
Hone Health is our top pick in hormone-TRT for most users. The trust signals are uniformly positive: BBB Accredited (relatively recent, Dec 2023), Trustpilot 4.8 across 10,000+ reviews with no fraud notice, no FDA warning letters, and a care model that requires baseline labs before prescribing (the right clinical standard). Pricing isn't the cheapest, but the all-in math at $157-$249/month with labs bundled from month three is honest and competitive. Choose Defy Medical if you specifically want MD/DO physicians with endocrinology backgrounds and are willing to pay premium pricing for that depth; choose Marek Health if you want the coaching-plus-prescribing model.
$129-$149/mo membership + ~$28-$100/mo medication
No financial relationshipFunction Health
Comprehensive lab-testing membership with MD review of every biomarker
Function Health is our top pick in DTC lab-testing-for-longevity. The $365/year price is genuinely competitive for two annual full panels with MD review of every biomarker, the panel breadth is among the largest in the category (160+ tests, 100+ biomarkers per draw), and Mark Hyman as clinical face plus the recent $298M raise at $2.5B valuation provide unusual operational depth for a DTC lab service. Counterweights are real but manageable: BBB NOT Accredited, recurring complaints about customer-support response time and unclear add-on pricing. For most readers wanting comprehensive lab-testing context for longevity decisions, this is the default recommendation.
$365/year (~$30/month) for two semi-annual full panels
No financial relationshipInsideTracker
Established blood-and-DNA biomarker testing with the strongest customer-service signal in our cohort
InsideTracker is a credible alternative to Function Health for DTC biomarker testing, with three differentiators that matter: a 15-year track record (founded circa 2009), peer-reviewed methodology research published in PubMed Central, and the strongest customer-service responsiveness signal in our lab-testing cohort (94% reply rate to negative Trustpilot reviews within one week). The honest counterweight: Function Health is meaningfully cheaper on a panel-per-dollar basis ($365/year for 100+ markers per draw twice a year vs InsideTracker's roughly $489-$829/year for 1-2 Ultimate tests at 54 markers each). Choose InsideTracker if you want the DNA add-on, smaller targeted panels, or the company's longer track record and customer-service responsiveness; choose Function for the broadest panel at the lowest annual cost.
$149/yr membership + $99-$589 per test (member discounts apply)
No financial relationshipEden
Vertically-integrated GLP-1 telehealth with notable customer-service caveats
Eden has the most ambitious supply-chain story in our cohort, they own the pharmacy that fills your prescription, with a publicized per-lot testing program. The catch is the gap between the marketing and the operational record. BBB shows real complaint patterns around billing and refunds, ConsumerAffairs reinforces those themes, and a class-action investigation is examining whether Eden has been sharing health data with third-party advertisers. We list Eden because the structural advantages are real, but we score the experience-side dimensions honestly. If supply-chain integrity matters more to you than billing predictability, this is a contender. If you want predictable cancellation and refund handling, look elsewhere.
Flat-rate; varies by program tier
No financial relationshipRo
Established multi-vertical telehealth with insurance concierge for branded GLP-1
The strongest pick in our cohort for users with commercial insurance, hands down. The insurance concierge is a genuine differentiator: on Wegovy or Zepbound with eligible coverage and a manufacturer savings card, your monthly cost drops to $0-$25, which no all-inclusive cash-pay specialist can match. The catch is the multi-product compounder relationship: the April 2025 FDA finasteride alert reflects on Ro's vendor management broadly, and BBB complaints about membership-vs-medication billing transparency are recurring. Pure cash-pay users on compounded GLP-1 will find better value at TrimRx or Eden.
$45 first month, $145/mo + medication
No financial relationshipDefy Medical
Established Tampa hormone clinic with MD/DO physicians and premium pricing
Defy Medical is the premium pick in hormone-TRT for users who specifically want MDs and DOs with endocrinology backgrounds and willingness to customize protocols beyond standard monotherapy. The physician-credential signal is the strongest in our cohort. The honest counterweights are real: BBB C rating with one unanswered complaint, recurring forum threads about refill delays, and pricing that runs $200-$350/month all-in vs Hone's $157-$249. Choose Defy if you've outgrown a basic TRT protocol and want depth; choose Hone Health if you want the cleaner trust posture and lower price.
$149-$350 initial consult + $200-$350/mo medication + lab fees
No financial relationshipHims & Hers
Public-company telehealth, post-settlement branded-only GLP-1 supply
If you specifically want a brand-name GLP-1 from a public-company telehealth platform with mature compliance infrastructure, post-settlement Hims is a credible option, especially for the new oral Wegovy pill. The insurance pathway can drive Wegovy to $0-$25/month with eligible coverage. The honest counterweight: the September 2025 FDA warning letters and the messy 2025 break with Novo Nordisk are both recent enough that we are docking the score below where a clean operator would land. Trustpilot at 3.0/5 with 28% one-star reviews is worse than Ro's, and the BBB A+ does not fully offset that. For pure cash-pay compounded GLP-1, Hims no longer competes (compounded is wound down post-settlement); look at TrimRx or Eden.
$39 first month, $149/mo membership + $149-$299/mo medication
No financial relationshipMarek Health
Coaching-plus-prescribing model with lab-heavy hormone optimization
Marek Health is a credible third option in hormone-TRT for users who specifically want the coaching-plus-prescribing model. The Trustpilot signal is consistent (4.8 across the smaller sample), the pricing is mid-range, and the lab-heavy approach is appropriate for hormone optimization. The honest counterweights: NOT BBB-accredited with no posted letter grade, smaller operational scale than Hone or Defy, and the all-in cost lands above Hone once you factor quarterly lab fees. Choose Hone for most cases; Marek if monthly coaching contact between provider visits is the binding need.
$250 initial deposit + $225-$275/mo medication + $350-$700/quarter labs
No financial relationshipTally Health
Epigenetic biological age testing with David Sinclair as scientific founder
Tally Health is a credible biological-age testing service for users specifically interested in the epigenetic age question, with David Sinclair's name behind the methodology and a transparent membership pricing model. The honest counterweights are real: small Trustpilot sample (only 37 reviews, 3.6/5), recurring complaints about result-delivery delays running 9+ weeks vs the advertised 2-4, and the recent April 2026 acquisition by Infinite Epigenetics adding operational uncertainty. For most users wanting longevity-context lab data, Function Health's broader panel at comparable price is the better default; Tally only makes sense if you specifically want the epigenetic age metric.
$129-$159/mo membership; $249 standalone TallyAge test
No financial relationshipMaximus
Fertility-preserving oral TRT with enclomiphene; published clinical study, but BBB F rating with unanswered complaints
Maximus is the only TRT provider in our cohort with a publicly-documented clinical study on its specific protocol (4x total testosterone and 5x free testosterone with LH/FSH preserved on the Oral T + Enclomiphene approach), which is a meaningful clinical-transparency advantage. The fertility-preservation angle is also genuinely differentiating for younger men or those concerned about fertility on traditional injectable TRT. Honest counterweights are real and stack: BBB F rating driven by unanswered complaints (structurally similar to Henry Meds's failure mode), small Trustpilot sample relative to cohort competitors, and a broader compounded-medication footprint that extends beyond TRT into GLP-1 and other categories. Choose Maximus if fertility-preserving oral TRT is specifically the binding need and you've read the BBB complaint pattern and decided you're comfortable with the operational risk; otherwise Hone Health remains the cleaner default for hormone-TRT.
$99.99/mo enclomiphene-only or $199.99/mo oral testosterone + enclomiphene (annual commitment)
No financial relationshipMochi Health
Flat-rate compounded GLP-1 with a vertically-integrated pharmacy under active state and federal scrutiny
Mochi Health is the most complicated provider in our cohort to score. The consumer-experience signal is strong (Trustpilot 4.4/5 across 15,600+ reviews with no fraud notice, board-certified obesity-medicine physicians, genuinely innovative flat-rate dose-independent pricing) and the FDA record is clean. The counterweight is heavy and substantively different from anything else in our cohort: Washington State pharmacy enforcement against Mochi's affiliated compounding pharmacy Aequita escalated to a Notice of Immediate Jeopardy after whistleblower allegations of unlicensed-worker sterile compounding and improper cold-chain shipping (frozen children's popsicles instead of medical-grade ice packs). Two active manufacturer lawsuits compound the picture. We list Mochi because the pricing model is genuinely interesting and the consumer experience is broadly positive, but we cannot recommend Mochi as a default option for any cohort segment given the substantiated pharmacy-quality concerns. Choose Mochi only if the flat-rate dose-independent pricing is specifically what you want and you have read the WA State enforcement record and decided you are comfortable with it.
$79/mo membership ($69 with insurance) + $99/mo semaglutide or $199/mo tirzepatide flat
No financial relationshipHenry Meds
Cohort-cheapest compounded GLP-1, with the cohort-worst trust signals
If pure cash price is the only thing that matters and you're going in eyes wide open on the trust caveats, Henry Meds is the cohort's discount option, by a wide margin on oral semaglutide and oral tirzepatide. The honest counterweights are heavy: an F at the BBB with 25 unanswered complaints, a Trustpilot page that carries a suspected-fake-review notice (so the 4.5-star headline does not mean what it appears to mean), and an active Eli Lilly lawsuit over the way the company markets compounded tirzepatide. We list Henry Meds because the price difference is real for cost-sensitive readers, but the trust premium is on you. For most readers, TrimRx or Eden is the better starting point even if the monthly cost is higher.
$99-$449/mo depending on medication and form
No financial relationshipRefresh cadence
Quarterly public-record checks (state licenses, FDA warning letters, accreditation status), annual full-questionnaire reviews, and immediate re-scoring on any major event. Each provider profile shows a last verified date.
How we vet, in 30 seconds
Every provider above is scored on six dimensions. Public weights, public rationale, never pay-to-rank.
What we verify
- ·State pharmacy & clinic licenses
- ·FDA warning-letter database
- ·Accreditations (PCAB, LegitScript, USP <797>)
- ·Recall history + complaint patterns
The six dimensions
- ·Licensure (20%)
- ·Accreditation (20%)
- ·Transparency (20%)
- ·Product quality (15%)
- ·Pricing (15%)
- ·Customer service (10%)
What we disclose
- ·Every affiliate relationship per listing
- ·Weighting math behind every score
- ·Source URLs for every verification
- ·When something is stated but unverified
Head-to-head comparisons
Stuck between two? We pick a winner per use case so you can scan to the row that matches how you'd actually use the platform.
Defy Medical vs Marek Health
Independent head-to-head: Defy Medical vs Marek Health for testosterone replacement therapy. 16-year MD/DO clinic with premium pricing vs newer coaching-plus-prescribing model with monthly check-ins.
See verdictDefy Medical vs Maximus
Independent head-to-head: Defy Medical vs Maximus for testosterone replacement. 16-year MD/DO clinic with protocol customization vs novel oral testosterone + enclomiphene with a published clinical study but BBB F rating.
See verdictEden vs Henry Meds
Independent head-to-head: Eden vs Henry Meds for compounded GLP-1 weight loss. Vertically-integrated specialist with the cohort's cleanest privacy-counterweight tradeoff vs the cohort-cheapest provider with the cohort-worst trust signals.
See verdictFrequently asked
About this directory, the rubric, and how we make money.
What does "vetted" mean here?
Each provider in this directory is independently scored on a public six-dimension rubric: licensure, accreditation, transparency, product quality, pricing, and customer service. We verify state pharmacy licenses against state board registries, FDA enforcement actions against the FDA warning-letter database, and accreditations against the relevant public registry where one exists. Every score has a one-line rationale and (where possible) a source link on the provider profile. The full methodology is at /methodology/provider-vetting.
Do you accept money from the providers you list?
Some providers in this directory have an affiliate relationship with us. When a reader clicks through and books a consultation, we may earn a per-click or per-qualified-consult fee. Inclusion in the directory is independent of whether a provider pays us. The rubric and ranking are not affected by who pays. Affiliate relationships are disclosed on every listing card with a "We earn a fee" pill, and the methodology page lists every compensation type we accept (per-click and per-qualified-consult only, never per-prescription).
Are compounded GLP-1 medications legal?
Yes, when prescribed by a licensed clinician and prepared by a state-licensed compounding pharmacy. Compounded versions are not FDA-approved (unlike brand-name Wegovy, Ozempic, Mounjaro, or Zepbound), but they are legally prepared at 503A pharmacies under individual prescriptions or at 503B FDA-registered outsourcing facilities. The legal landscape has evolved through 2025-2026; many telehealth providers offer both compounded and brand-name options. The FDA has not yet acted on most compounded telehealth platforms, but Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk have filed lawsuits against several compounders over advertising claims.
How do you choose which providers to evaluate?
We start with the highest-trafficked telehealth platforms in each category (compounded GLP-1, brand-name GLP-1, longevity clinics, peptide compounding) and work down. Reader suggestions are prioritized in the next review cycle, email us via /contact with a name and a link.
Why is one provider ranked higher than another?
Because their weighted rubric score is higher. The score combines six dimensions with public weights: licensure (20%), accreditation (20%), transparency (20%), product quality (15%), pricing (15%), and customer service (10%). Each provider profile breaks down their score per dimension with a rationale, so you can see exactly which dimensions drove the ranking and disagree with specific scores if you want.
How often do you update this directory?
Public-record checks (state license, accreditation status, FDA warning letters) every quarter. The full Tier-3 questionnaire annually for active providers, and immediately whenever a major event happens (recall, regulatory action, ownership change, lawsuit). Each provider profile shows a "last verified" date so you can see how fresh the information is.
I had a bad experience with a provider you listed. What now?
Email us at /contact with details. If it's a one-off we note it and watch for patterns. If it's representative of broader issues, the listing comes down or gets re-scored. We'd rather de-list a provider than defend one we shouldn't have listed.
What if I have commercial insurance, should I still use these providers?
It depends. Compounded GLP-1 medications aren't covered by insurance regardless of provider, the cash-pay model is the model. If you have insurance that covers brand-name Wegovy, Ozempic, or Zepbound, providers with insurance concierge support (like Ro) become much more attractive because your effective monthly cost can drop to $0–$25 with savings cards and prior authorization. We try to flag these tradeoffs in each provider's "Best for / Look elsewhere if" section.
Have a question we didn't answer, or a provider you think we should evaluate?
Get in touch